Copyright Law
My genius and I had this totally long rad conversation about Copyright law, and its status, future and validity last night. My blog about it won't really compare, so you're just going to have to be jealous that:
1. You're not us, in our totally hot intense relationship.
2. You're not our
dog, who is privvy to all of our conversations (amongst "other" things).
3. You're not smart enough to have thought these thoughts yourself.
So there.
Anyway, to sum up the questions and thoughts I have about copyright laws, I first want / think it is appropriate to say that I think the laws are applied differently with respect to different media. I DID take a supplemental class in copyright laws, but it mostly dealt with print copyright law, specifically, those that apply to books. I have some question as to whether the law SHOULD apply differently- if we should think differently about a song than we do about a novel. I think we naturally DO think about them differently, which is what instills the sometimes confusing melange of thoughts with regard to the state of artistic ownership rights today. As it is, the issue is only further clouded by the ever present monetary value we place on art as a commodity. Dig?
So then, I think essentially it is true that as an artist, a creator of something, one should, if one chooses, have the rights to the creation. Meaning this: photographers own the rights to their images unless they give up or sell those rights. I feel this way also about novels and songs and so on.
I think it is ALWAYS true that if you are an artist and you DESIRE no control over your creations, then you, of course, should be allowed to relinquish it. But one should always have the option of retaining that control - you know, if I had had the good fortune to invent Captain Jean-Luc Picard of the Starship Enterprise, I might not want his character featured heavily in a Romance novel written by someone I did not know. On the other hand... I might. The point is, as the creator of the character, I would like to be consulted before Captain Picard begins having adventures of his own without me. Just saying.
But I've oversimplified, I know. The truth is that things are changing, you know, because of the internets. I'm not sure exactly what this means, and I don't know if it's good or bad in the long run, and how I feel about it. I think in one way, I am all for further freedom of people's ability to distribute their arts over the internets quite freely and with a total disregard for the machineryof tradional publishing avenues- both in the printed word and the music world. Everybody knows that the Music Industry totally sucks. So does Major publishing, in many ways, though obviously far less so than the major labels, who are godless and soul-sucking. So I'm all for anything that degrades their power. It's too complicated for me to think about right now.
After all, I am at work.
Read More...
Summary only...